Frankenstein and Cultural Studies
Many shelly’s
novel has morphed into countless forms in both highbrow and popular culture,
including the visual arts, fiction and nonfiction,stage plays, film,
television, advertising , clothing , jewelry, toys, key chains , coffee mugs,
games, Halloween costumes, comic books, jokes, cartoons, pornography, academic
study, fan clubs, web sites ,and even food. Shelly’s creation teaches us not to
underestimate the power of youth culture.
1) Revolutionary Births
Born like its creator in an age of
revolution, Frankenstein challenged accepted ideas of its day.As it has become
increasingly commodified by modern consumer culture, one wonders whether its
original revolutionary spirit and its critique of scientific, philosophical,
political, and gender issues have become obscured, or whether instead its
continuing transformation attests to its essential oppositional nature. Today,
as George Le-vine remarks, Frankenstein is “ a vital metaphor, peculiarly
appropriate to a culture dominated by a consumer technology neurotically
obsessed with ‘getting in touch’ with its authentic self and frightened at what
it is discovering “ Hardly a day goes by without our seeing an image or
allusion to Frankenstein from CNN descriptions of Saddam Hussein as an
“American – created Frankenstein,” to magazine articles that warn of
genetically engineered “Frankenfoods,” test-tube babies and cloning. Below we
examine the political and scientific issues of the novel, then survey its
amazing career in population adaptations in fiction, drama, film, and
television. Parnaps no. other novel addresses such critical contemporary
scientific and political concerns while at the same time providing Saturday
afternoon entertainment to generation.
a) The
creature as proletarian we recall from earlier chapters that many Shelley lived
during times of great upheaval in Britain; not only was her own family full of
redical thinkers, but she also met many others such as Thomas paine and William
Blake. Percy Shelly was thought of as a dangerous redical bent on labor reform
and was spied upon by the government. In Frankenstein, what Johanna M. Smith
calls the “alternation between fear of vengeful revolution and sympathy for the
suffering poor” (14) illuminates Mary Shelly’s own divisions between ,
revolutionary ardor and fear of the masses. Like her father , eho worried about
the mob’s “excess of a virtuous feeling “ fearing its “sick destructiveness” ,
Mary Shelly’s creature is a political and moral paradox, both an innocent and a
cold-blooded murderer.
Monster
like the creature are indeed paradoxical. On the one hand, they transgress
against “ the establishment”; if the monster survival, however dis figured(skal
278). On the other hand, we are reassured when we see that society can capture
and destroy monsters. Such dualism would explain the great number of
Frankenstein –as-mutant movies that appeared during t Cultural Studies Frankenstien
Marry Shally’s
novel has morphed into countless forms in both highbrow and popular culture,
including the visual arts, fiction and nonfiction,stage plays, film,
television, advertising , clothing , jewelry, toys, key chains , coffee mugs,
games, Halloween costumes, comic books, jokes, cartoons, pornography, academic
study, fan clubs, web sites ,and even food. Shelly’s creation teaches us not to
underestimate the power of youth culture.
1) Revolutionary
Births
Born like its creator in an age of
revolution, Frankenstein challenged accepted ideas of its day.As it has become
increasingly commodified by modern consumer culture, one wonders whether its
original revolutionary spirit and its critique of scientific, philosophical,
political, and gender issues have become obscured, or whether instead its
continuing transformation attests to its essential oppositional nature. Today,
as George Le-vine remarks, Frankenstein is “ a vital metaphor, peculiarly
appropriate to a culture dominated by a consumer technology neurotically
obsessed with ‘getting in touch’ with its authentic self and frightened at what
it is discovering “ Hardly a day goes by without our seeing an image or
allusion to Frankenstein from CNN descriptions of Saddam Hussein as an
“American – created Frankenstein,” to magazine articles that warn of
genetically engineered “Frankenfoods,” test-tube babies and cloning. Below we
examine the political and scientific issues of the novel, then survey its
amazing career in population adaptations in fiction, drama, film, and
television. Parnaps no. other novel addresses such critical contemporary
scientific and political concerns while at the same time providing Saturday
afternoon entertainment to generation.
a) The
creature as proletarian we recall from earlier chapters that many Shelley lived
during times of great upheaval in Britain; not only was her own family full of
redical thinkers, but she also met many others such as Thomas paine and William
Blake. Percy Shelly was thought of as a dangerous redical bent on labor reform
and was spied upon by the government. In Frankenstein, what Johanna M. Smith
calls the “alternation between fear of vengeful revolution and sympathy for the
suffering poor” (14) illuminates Mary Shelly’s own divisions between ,
revolutionary ardor and fear of the masses. Like her father , eho worried about
the mob’s “excess of a virtuous feeling “ fearing its “sick destructiveness” ,
Mary Shelly’s creature is a political and moral paradox, both an innocent and a
cold-blooded murderer.
Monster
like the creature are indeed paradoxical. On the one hand, they transgress
against “ the establishment”; if the monster survival, however dis figured(skal
278). On the other hand, we are reassured when we see that society can capture
and destroy monsters. Such dualism would explain the great number of
Frankenstein –as-mutant movies that appeared during the cold war. But the
creature’s rebellious nature is rooted far in the past. In the De Lacys’ shed
he reads three books, beginning with paradise Lost. Not only are the eternal
questions about the ways of God the man in paradise Lost relevant to the
creature’s predicament, but in shelley’s time Milton’s epic poem was seen, as
timothy morton puts it, as “a seminal work of republicanism and the sublime
that inspired many of the Romantics.” The creature next reads a volume from
Plutarch’s lives, which in the early nineteenth century was read as “a classis
republican text, admired in the Enlightement by such writers as Rousseau.”
Goethe’s the sorrows of young werther,the creature’s third book,is the
prototypical rebellious romantic novel. In short ,says Morton,” The creature’s
literary education is radical” (151). But the creature’s idealistic education
does him little good, and he has no chance of reforming society so that it will
accept him
he cold war. But the
creature’s rebellious nature is rooted far in the past. In the De Lacys’ shed
he reads three books, beginning with paradise Lost. Not only are the eternal
questions about the ways of God the man in paradise Lost relevant to the
creature’s predicament, but in shelley’s time Milton’s epic poem was seen, as
timothy morton puts it, as “a seminal work of republicanism and the sublime
that inspired many of the Romantics.” The creature next reads a volume from
Plutarch’s lives, which in the early nineteenth century was read as “a classis
republican text, admired in the Enlightement by such writers as Rousseau.”
Goethe’s the sorrows of young werther,the creature’s third book,is the
prototypical rebellious romantic novel. In short ,says Morton,” The creature’s
literary education is radical” (151). But the creature’s idealistic education
does him little good, and he has no chance of reforming society so that it will
accept him
No comments:
Post a Comment